EVE Search - Posts by The Investor

Result 1-6 of 6 for by author The Investor (0,02 seconds)

Pages: [1]
1. Scanning Changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Merchant Rova wrote: The Investor wrote: system retained your scanning info until the site de-spawned Pretty sure legacy code says no, though I'd be cool to do Yeah :( But no time like the present to stamp out legacy code - by The Investor - at 2016.08.26 05:19:50
2. Scanning Changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Yeah the scanning UI needs work. It has improved a lot but you are right that there are still a LOT of changes it needs if it's to be a suitable replacement. For me the most annoying is how faint the icons are (which seems like it should be a 5 mi... - by The Investor - at 2016.08.25 06:59:01
3. Scanning Changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Background: Since the new scanner was released, it has gotten progressively better. This seems like an ideal time to propose scanning changes, since the new probe and d-scanners are soon probably going to replace the old ones completely (there are... - by The Investor - at 2016.08.25 01:54:16
4. Supercarrier Docking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] elitatwo wrote: eVRiAL wrote: I think inability to dock is very unappealing to play and stupid by design of early game. Supers should be allowed to dock in NPC, just let pilot charge 350m for supercapital size. Hmm.. NPC station 50km long... - by The Investor - at 2016.08.20 17:59:51
5. Supercarrier Docking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Kenrailae wrote: Yeah I know. Hence the Insert when has CCP ever cared about Size ratio's bit lol Indeed.....I agree that it should make sense logically but that has never really been an issue with CCP, as people have mentioned. All I kn... - by The Investor - at 2016.08.20 00:16:30
6. Supercarrier Docking - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Preface: Supercarriers are underused by groups who cannot defend them. In a sense, if you can't field 5-6 of them, there's no point in having one because it's too easy to be countered. However it would be nice to bring them more into the mainstrea... - by The Investor - at 2016.08.19 20:55:08
Pages: [1]
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

An Error Occured

Arguments are of the wrong type, are out of acceptable range, or are in conflict with one another.

The Error has been logged and will be further investigated shortly.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.